This text informs readers about why it is a good idea to keep art programs in the school systems. This piece was broken into sections explaining the current (poor) state of art education in schools, explaining the benefits of art education, and how we can bring these art programs back. The author, Valeriya Metla, is an established author on the Law Street website, as well as a few other websites.
Melta writes to the average American citizen. I say this because, in addition to explaining the state of art education in American schools, she explains what readers can do to bring art programs back. This text was written as a response to the decline of art education in the American education system. Metla's research shows a significant downward trend of how many schools offer art to their students.
The author of this piece established her ethos throughout the essay. Metla used facts and sources to help prove her credibility. This author displays her knowledge of the topic to her readers. The effect of this rhetoric is to prove to readers why they should trust this particular person when she says there are benefits to a high school art program.
Varleriya Metla wrote this piece because she believes that art education should make a comeback in America. She wrote this in an attempt to inspire other people to want to bring art back. Obviously, simply writing something does not wish it into being, but I believe that Valeriya Metla achieved her purpose. She teaches readers why art education is valuable, and goes on to teach readers ways to bring it back in schools were art programs have been cut.
No comments:
Post a Comment